About NUHS

Very Low Birth Weight

2026/07/23

Optimising Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight Babies

Case study

Background

A "Very Low Birth Weight" (VLBW) baby is a premature newborn with a birth weight below 1,500 grams. Improving neonatal outcomes is a key clinical and operational priority, as cost of care for VLBW babies is very high due to their prolonged stay in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU), high resource utilisation, and potential morbidities such as sepsis, intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, chronic lung disease, and necrotising enterocolitis. Every year, 45 to 65 VLBW babies are admitted to the NICU.

Low birth weight
Low birth weight
Low birth weight
Low birth weight

Objectives

Improve the quality of care of VLBW babies, as defined by clinical quality index (CQI), and to reduce cost of care.

Methodology

We chose the Value Driven Outcome (VDO) methodology as its underlying philosophy – optimising care while rationalising cost – matches our desired objectives. Value is defined as the level of Quality against a given Cost and expressed as Value = Quality/Cost. VDO allows near-instantaneous monitoring of quality, resource utilisation, and cost; thereby, facilitating implementation of targeted interventions.

To measure overall neonatal outcomes, we tracked 13 indicators that include: 

  • internationally benchmarked very low birth weight outcomes,
  • resource utilisation, and
  • patient experience score.

We provide data for four years of intervention (2017–2020) compared against preintervention, baseline years (2015-2016). Baseline data indicated suboptimal neonatal outcomes in at least three categories:

  • late onset sepsis,
  • chronic lung disease, and
  • prolonged hospitalisation due to sub-optimum weight gain.
Thus, comprehensive interventions targeted following key areas:

    Quality Indicators - Patient Outcomes

    • Length of stay <= 58 Days
    • No In-hospital mortality
    • No Late onset sepsis
    • No Incidence of chronic lung disease (respiratory support at 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age)
    • No Incidence of Retinopathy of Prematurity (Stage 3 and above)
    • No Incidence of Intraventricular hemorrhage (Grade 3 and above) and periventricular leukomalacia
    • No Incidence of Necrotising enterocolitis
    • No Readmission rate within 30 days of discharge

    Quality Indicators - Resource Utilisation

    • Number of x-rays done <= 13
    • Number of blood gas done <= 30
    • Number of blood glucose done <= 67
    • Duration of central lines <= 17 days

    Quality Indicators - Patient Experience

    • Patient Experience Score >= 8


    The threshold target of the quality indicators such as “Length of stay <= 58 Days”, “Number of x-rays done <= 13”, “Number of blood gas done <= 30”, “Number of blood glucose done <= 66” and “Duration of central lines <= 17 days” were determined using the median value of the baseline years.

    Results

    Clinical Quality Index (CQI)

    CQI is the number of patients who met all 13 indicators divided by total number of patients. CQI improved significantly from 13% to 39% between year 2015 to 2019, then dropped slightly to 31% in 2020.

    Cost of Care

    The cost of patient care reduced significantly in 2018. However, due to combination of factors including a cost-rebase exercise in 2019, cost has increased compared to baseline years.

    Quality Indicators

    Indicators improved consistently in 4 of 13 categories, from 2015 to 2020: rate of central line days <= 17 days (47.5% to 77.6%); late onset sepsis (12.5% to 5.2%); number of blood glucose done <= 67 (30% to 77%); severe intraventricular hemorrhage & periventricular le ukomalacia (10% to 3%). The incidence of chronic lung disease showed deteriorating trend partly due to improved survival of extreme premature babies. Incidence of retinopathy of prematurity worsened in 2019-2020 to 16.1% and 16.7%. Following that, we instituted several interventions; ongoing monitoring shows severe ROP rate has reduced to 4.7% in 2021.

    Fig 1: Rate of central line days <=17 days (2015-2020)

    Chart showing improved neonatal outcomes: Rate of central line days from 2015 to 2020 at NUHS

    Fig 2: Rate of late onset sepsis (2015 – 2020)

    Chart showing very low birth weight outcomes: Rate of late onset sepsis from 2015 to 2020

    Fig 3: Number of blood glucose done <=67 ( 2015- 2020)

    Chart showing improved neonatal outcomes: Rate of glucose from 2015 to 2020

    Fig 4: Rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia (2015-2020)

    Chart showing improved neonatal outcomes: Rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia from 2015 to 2020

    Conclusion

    We recognised at the outset that, unlike other VDO projects, the CQI of 100% is unachievable. VLBW babies who are extremely premature (less than 1000g birth weight) are likely to have many morbidities with duration of hospital stay exceeding 58 days. Nevertheless, we demonstrated sustained improvement in overall neonatal outcomes, CQI and many individual quality indicators from baseline to interventional years through multidisciplinary team effort and parental involvement.

    Team members
    • Zubair Amin, Department of Neonatology, Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children’s Medical Institute, National University Hospital 
    • Yvonne Ng Peng Mei, Department of Neonatology, Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children’s Medical Institute, National University Hospital
    • Krishnamoorthy Niduvaje, Department of Neonatology, Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children’s Medical Institute, National University Hospital
    • Roslin Othman, Department of Nursing, National University Hospital
    • Lee Soke Yee, Department of Nursing, National University Hospital
    • Wang Xia, Department of Nursing, National University Hospital
    1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Singapore 119228
    Last updated on
    Best viewed with Chrome 79.0, Edge 112.0, Firefox 61.0, Safari 11
    National University Health System
    • National University Hospital
    • Ng Teng Fong General Hospital
    • Alexandra Hospital
    • Tengah General and Community Hospital
    • Jurong Community Hospital
    • National University Polyclinics
    • Jurong Medical Centre
    • National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
    • National University Heart Centre, Singapore
    • National University Centre for Oral Health, Singapore
    • NUHS Diagnostics
    • NUHS Pharmacy
    • NUHS Regional Health System Office
    • NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine
    • NUS Faculty of Dentistry
    • NUS Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health
    Back to Top